Although large majorities of the public claim to be "deeply spiritual" and say that their religious faith is "very important" in their life, only 15% of those who regularly attend a Christian church ranked their relationship with God as the top priority in their life. As alarming as that finding was, its significance was magnified by research showing that on average pastors believe that 70% of the adults in their congregation consider their relationship with God to be their highest priority in life.- From "Barna Lists the 12 Most Significant Religious Findings," December 20, 2006 (emphasis mine)"As iron sharpens iron, so a friend sharpens a friend." (
Proverbs 27:17, NLT) I really want to get input from you on where I'm going with this.
I've used way too many words in this post, and I still think that I'm not communicating my point well. Your grace is appreciated, along with the understanding that I'll certainly have to clarify some things.

In the field behind our house are cows, visually reminding me that it's odd that a creature which attracts so many flies and has generally disgusting behaviors is not only edible, but delicious. If I had the responsibility of feeding these animals and they'd eaten all the grass, I'd probably give them hay, store-bought feed, or something similar. Now,
imagine a totally unlikely scenario: that monkeys also lived in the pasture with the cows, and the electric fence (however improbable) kept them there. I could give this weird mix of animals all the hay I could buy, but monkeys, while they eat a variety of things -- fruit, flowers, insects, etc. -- would likely not eat the hay or cattle feed.
They're different creatures with different habits, habitats, and dietary needs.
Over the past few months I've been studying the Word, looking at the modern Church, and how the two compare, and
I've been seeing this sort of dichotomy. A chunk of my responsibility is focused on our weekend gatherings -- the Bible describes these as meetings of the saints/believers -- and within that responsibility is to shepherd, teach, and lead these people in "worship." The most obvious means of doing that as it relates to my task is through music.
There is little doubt that a song can be used by God to pierce the heart of non-believer, and Scripture supports the idea that a non-believer can be in the assembly of the saints and be impacted and changed by the Holy Spirit through what happens there.
However, one of my struggles comes when I realize that, like the improbable scenario with cows and monkeys, on Sundays the church in general sees
a large group of people, probably half of whom don't revere God and don't know Christ personally*, who meet together in one room, and we "feed" them all the same stuff.
I'm not talking about the preaching of the Word in this case. For now I'm just talking about the songs we sing.While some non-believers could give thanks to God as they've seen Him work, and believe He exists but don't have a relationship with Him,
someone who doesn't know or love God can't "worship" Him. That's a
non sequitur. Songs that believers could sing with a heart of thanks to God are songs that are often
irrelevant to a non-believer, or might even focus the non-believer on something other than God.
For instance, if I knew without any doubt that I were meeting for worship with 100 completely sold-out followers of Christ -- not "perfect" people, but ones who are desperate to know Him more deeply every moment -- I would have little problem singing "My Country, 'Tis of Thee" as a song of thanks to God. But what about singing that same song in a "worship service" crowded with people who don't know Christ? It directly communicates that our country is great, end of story.
Non-believers can immediately identify with that, but they can't identify with the concept that God is to be intimately and corporately praised and adored, and that is the stated purpose of our worship meetings.
To be sure, of all places to live on the earth,
Americans are blessed and privileged beyond measure. Let there be no doubt that I am grateful to the core for those who have fought and died for us, and those who continue to do so. We live in the best country in the world, without a doubt.
This all makes these weekends (like July 4) tough for me. Our purpose in meeting with the believers is to worship our Creator; the Giver of all good things. That will naturally be the focus of someone who loves Christ, but that simply cannot be the focus of someone who cares nothing about Him. (I believe a counter-argument would be that everyone already knows we're there to worship God;
it's a church service, for Pete's sake! But have you ever thought about what we communicate to those with no concept of what it means to worship God or to sacrifice our desires and possessions for His sake?)
Yes,
absolutely -- let's get together as Americans to sing these kinds songs and remind one another of the heroes who have selflessly sacrificed, and to show our national pride. Let's blow a little bit of our money on fireworks (while observing safety precautions) and wear red, white, and blue. But when we're together for worship of the one true God, we need to keep in mind that
we've set up our whole system of worship meetings to include people -- maybe even a majority of them -- who don't love God (and that doesn't just include "seeker-sensitive" fellowships). I'm not being condescending or graceless; I'm stating what is apparently fact. If we've set our own table, shouldn't we be serving the correct food?
I use the above examples of patriotic music only because they bring the issue into the most stark focus for me. I wonder if anyone else sees the same problems I see.
- Do you believe I'm being completely AR? (that link goes to a definition...)
- Do you agree with the premise that a whopping number of non-believers meets with the Church?
- Is it a good thing for believers and non-believers to get together and find common ground in a worship service apart from worshipping God?
- If so, do we see applicable Biblical examples?
*"Half" seems to be a conservative estimate sometimes attributed to Billy Graham. Here is a good article by the Barna group on the subject, and here is a startling one.